Oakwood Salt Dome, East Texas: Surface Geology and Drainage Analysis
Oakwood Salt Dome in Leon and Freestone Counties, East Texas, is under consideration as a nuclear waste repository. The surficial geology above the dome provides information needed to evaluate the last stages of salt growth in Oakwood Dome and has a bearing on studies of ground-water flow patterns. The Claiborne Group has been uplifted, exposed, and eroded as a result of dome growth. The Carrizo, Reklaw, and Queen City Formations crop out over the dome. The Carrizo Formation comprises bedload- dominated alluvial deposits and is an important aquifer. The Newby Member of the Reklaw Formation was deposited during marine transgression; the overlying Marquez Member was deposited in a partly restricted marginal embayment, and crevasse splays and small bayhead deltas constitute coarser grained facies. The Queen City Formation comprises upward-coarsening shoal-water delta sequences and polymodally crossbedded, marginal-marine sand shoals. Slight thinning of these formations over Oakwood Dome suggests growth contemporaneous with deposition. Deposition over a topographically domed but totally stable area would not account for the vertically repetitive patterns of stratal thinning. Quaternary terrace deposits are poorly preserved and reveal no evidence of warping or faulting related to dome movement. However, geomorphic anomalies, such as cut-off channels, recent stream incision into bedrock and related Holocene terraces, abundant nickpoints in homogeneous bedrock, and evidence from drainage patterns, suggest the possibility of minor dome movement during the Pleistocene Epoch. The occurrence of thicker Holocene floodplain sediments over the central dome area, as compared with those of the southern flank of the dome, may indicate continuing subsidence related to cap rock or salt solution. There is insufficient evidence to confirm this conclusion.
Collins, E. W., Dix, O. R., and Hobday, D. K., 1981, Oakwood Salt Dome, East Texas: Surface Geology and Drainage Analysis: The University of Texas at Austin, Bureau of Economic Geology, Geological Circular 81-6, 23 p. doi.org/10.23867/gc8106D.
Number of figures
Number of pages
The University of Texas at Austin, Bureau of Economic Geology