We
are employing a rock-fabric methodology to calculate permeability
in the Fullerton Clear Fork reservoir. This methodology is based
on the observation that different rock fabrics display distinct
porosity/permeability interrelationships. To use this approach,
one must define (1) the number and types of rock fabrics on the
basis of their fabric, pore type (Figure 8), lithology, and crystal
size, and (2) the distribution of these rock fabrics within the
stratigraphic framework. Relationships between porosity and permeability
can then be used to define and apply transforms for each rock-fabric
class. To achieve this goal, we assembled a complete and unbiased
calibration data set of core-plug samples and matched thin sections
for the entire lower Clear Fork-Wichita reservoir succession at
Fullerton. Carefully prepared and analyzed core-plug data were then
compared with thin-section descriptions of each plug to define rock-fabric
(RF) classes.
Initial interpretations
from this work demonstrate that the Wichita consists dominantly
of tidal-flat fabrics (Figure 9) including RF Class 3 mud-dominated
limestones, and RF Class 3 fine-crystalline mud-dominated dolostones
(Figure 10). Porosity/permeability data from these samples plot
as expected in the RF Class 3 field. The lower Clear Fork high-frequency
sequence L2.1 contains mostly RF Class 2 grain-dominated dolopackstones
(Figure 11), medium-crystalline mud-dominated dolostones, and RF
Class 1 lime grainstones. However, because these lime grainstones
contain significant separate-vug porosity (Figure 12), they exhibit
Class 2 or 3 porosity/permeability relationships. Lower Clear Fork
high-frequency sequence L2.2 rocks contain similar rock fabrics
to those in L2.1, but many RF Class 2 dolostones display petrophysical
Class 1 porosity/permeability relationships. We think this inconsistency,
which has been observed in other Clear Fork successions (but not
in other Permian carbonate rocks), is due to the presence of poikilotopic
anhydrite (Figure 13); the presence of anhydrite in patches causes
a decrease in porosity but little corresponding decrease in permeability.
Although reservoir
cycles (Figure 6) typically display muddy, low-porosity bases and
more porous grain-dominated tops, these facies do not necessarily
correspond to changes in RF class. Major changes in RF class, which
seem to be controlled by a combination of diagenesis and facies,
instead are more apparent at the scale of cycle sets or high-frequency
sequences. |