![]() |
![]() |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
TECHNICAL PROGRESS SEQUENCE STRATIGRAPHIC FRAMEWORK The project team has developed a firm sequence-stratigraphic framework that integrates the genetic stratigraphic framework and systems tracts within and between Starfak and Tiger Shoal fields. As deduced in part from biostratigraphic data, the chronology of the genetic cycles coincides closely with that of published syntheses. This achievement represents a fundamental step in the reservoir characterization of these two fields and lays the critical groundwork for all subsequent, more focused analyses of reservoir-specific attributes and the identification of previously undetected gas and oil prospects one of the principal objectives of this project. The model is useful in myriad ways:
The sequence-stratigraphic framework of the Miocene Series can be readily extrapolated to surrounding offshore fields using regional biostratigraphical markers. The overall regressive, progradational Miocene succession comprises (in ascending order) slope and slope-fan deposits, distal shelf and lowstand-delta (lowstand deltaic wedge) facies, and medial and proximal shelf systems. Inferred coastal-plain deposits occur within 200 to 300 ft above the top of the study interval. Delineation of the third-order sequences within these general facies tracts allows further division of the slope and shelf systems into finer scale lowstand, transgressive, and highstand systems tracts that honor precise time-stratigraphic boundaries. Lowstand Systems Tract All four elements of the lowstand systems tract are collectively represented in Starfak and Tiger Shoal fields. They include basin-floor fans, slope fans, lowstand deltaic wedges, and incised-valley fills. The first three components compose lowstand prograding wedges.
Basin-Floor Fan Slope Fan Lowstand Deltaic Wedge In contrast to Starfak field, lowstand deltaic wedges are absent in Tiger Shoal because Tiger Shoal is in a generally more proximal depositional position relative to Starfak. Isolated wells located south (basinward) of Tiger Shoal field exhibit inferred deltaic wedge sandstones in some of the same intervals (sequences) that contain wedge deposits in the southern part of Starfak field. Lowstand prograding wedges and other time-equivalent distal-shelf to upper-slope successions typically overlie, or are cut by, numerous penecontemporaneous (growth) faults in Starfak field and in the untested area between the two fields. This relation suggests that movement on these faults influenced the position of the shelf edges and, therefore, the updip limits of lowstand prograding wedges. In Starfak field, these faults represent at least two generations of syndepositional-faulting episodes that probably (1) controlled the positions of the shelf/slope break and, consequently, the location of lowstand-deltaic sedimentation and (2) enhanced accommodation rates for downdip-thickening lowstand-deltaic deposits. The recognition of lowstand prograding wedges within the Miocene succession is one of the more significant findings of this study thus far. Starfak field contains four third-order prograding wedges that can be clearly imaged using seismic data in areas outside of well control. Sandstone zones that display prominent coastal-onlap geometry within the third-order lowstand systems tracts form potential stratigraphic traps for hydrocarbon accumulation in the untested region between Starfak and Tiger Shoal fields. Because these third-order lowstand prograding wedges are proven producers in Starfak field and seismic data indicate that the sandstone-rich wedges, with the similar internal sandstone geometries, extend to the east, we believe there is high potential for new discoveries in the untested interfield area. Moreover, the block-faulted lowstand systems tracts within deeper third-order sequences, which also extend into the untested interfield area and are prominent producers in Starfak field, are also very likely candidates for new hydrocarbon discoveries. Incised Valley
Fill Changes in log motif (indicating changes in net-sandstone or sandstone/shale distribution) that characterize incised-valley-fill facies are associated with the spatial location of the lowstand valley relative to the proximal, medial, or distal paleoshelf. The magnitude of valley incision increases and valley fills generally thicken to the south, downdip on the paleoshelf. Log signatures of the valley fill in those reaches of the valleys incised into proximal and medial paleoshelf settings are blocky, blocky serrated, or upward fining. This character records well-developed (low-clay-content), high-porosity stacked fluvial-channel architectural elements. These are dominantly lowstand fills inferred to have aggraded during late lowstand time when relative sea level was stable or slowly rising. Lowstand fluvial fills are overlain by valley-confined transgressive deposits. In contrast, thicker valley fills (as much as ~250 ft) are located in more distal shelf locations. These valleys form areally restricted topographic "notches" in the paleoshelf margin. Valleys are located immediately upslope from lowstand prograding wedges that were fed with sediments cannabalized from erosion of the underlying highstand shelf deposits as "knickpoints" eroded landward, forming the final lowstand river profiles. Transgressive Systems Tract The thin (10- to 40-ft) backstepping, progradational successions (retrogradational parasequence sets) that compose transgressive systems tracts disconformably overlie the transgressive surfaces within lowstand valley-fill deposits and above lowstand wedges and merge with the sequence boundaries in interfluve areas. These parasequence sets form stacked, upward-fining log-facies successions that culminate in a high gamma-ray response signifying the maximum marine flooding event, the marine condensed section In most of the study area, however, the condensed sections are composed of regionally correlatable organic-rich shales deposited under tranquil marine conditions during inundation of the shelf.
Incised valleys in the proximal to medial shelf facies of the study interval generally contain less than about 50 percent transgressive-system-tract deposits, which are thinly interstratified silty sands and shales in an overall upward-fining interval. These transgressive sands and shales are interpreted to represent fine-grained estuarine and coarser grained bayhead delta sediments, both of which are areally restricted to the confines of the physiographic incised valley. The more distal valleys that are incised into the upper slope and filled with late-lowstand sands separated by thin, intervening shales within a generally overall aggradational succession contain little transgressive fill. Highstand Systems Tract Sediments of highstand systems tracts form progradational parasequence sets that generally display upward trends of parasequence thinning and increase in percentage of sand within parasequences. These upward-coarsening successions are typically 150 to 200 ft thick in most of the study interval, but they range from as thin as 60 ft in the most proximal shelf locations to as thick as 600 ft in the distal-shelf areas. Sands within late-highstand parasequences, the uppermost parasequences of the progradational parasequence sets, represent delta-front deposits, locally developed distributary channel fills, delta-mouth bars, and interdeltaic shoreface facies. Early-highstand parasequences originated as more distal variations of these same deltaic and shoreface environments of deposition. Seismic stratal slices of highstand successions illustrate generally lobate and digitate aerial geometries.
|