|
![]() |
||||
|
Groundwater Vulnerability and the Meaning of Groundwater Age Dates Dr. Graham Fogg
Hydrologist and Professor of Hydrogeology
Department of Land, Air and Water
Resources, University of California at Davis
ABSTRACT A more detailed analysis of both hydrostratigraphy and transport in the eastern San Joaquin Valley, California leads to refinements in the vulnerability mapping approach and further investigation of age distributions in water samples. A new approach to modeling alluvial fan heterogeneity uses geostatistical simulation in a sequence stratigraphic framework in which paleosols form sequence boundaries and semi-confining beds. This model of multi-scale heterogeneity produces detailed maps of vulnerability that more accurately reflect the geology, including nonstationary heterogeneity. Simulated CFC-11 and -12 age dates agree closely with field measured CFC-11 and -12 ages. Importantly, however, the distributions of water age reaching the well screens in the model at any instant in time are both broad (many decades) and skewed, except at shallow (<10 m) wells. Significant dispersion due to heterogeneity causes mixing of relatively old water (> 40 yr) with young water in most wells, even when the well screen is short (<1 m). Consequently, the "true" average groundwater age differs significantly from the CFC age. These results suggest that groundwater age date measurements alone are inadequate for estimating vulnerability to contamination in systems with typical alluvial heterogeneity. http://lawr.ucdavis.edu/faculty/fogg/outline.htm
|