Size: 1
GCCC Forums - Monitoring above-zone temperature variations associated with CO2 and brine leakage from the storage aquifer
GCCC Forums  

Go Back   GCCC Forums > Gulf Coast Carbon Center Publication Library > GCCC Bookshelf

Forgot your password? Click here!


Browse by Collection
Library Item Details
Title Monitoring above-zone temperature variations associated with CO2 and brine leakage from the storage aquifer
Alt. Title
Short Title
Contributors
Nicot, J.-P.
Zeidouni, M.
Hovorka, S.D.
Abstract

CO2 injection in saline aquifers induces temperature changes owing to processes such as Joule–Thomson cooling, endothermic water vaporization, exothermic CO2 dissolution besides the temperature discrepancy between injected and native fluids. CO2 leaking from the injection zone, in addition to initial temperature contrast due to the geothermal gradient, undergoes similar processes, causing temperature changes in the above zone. Numerical simulation tools were used to evaluate temperature changes associated with CO2 leakage from the storage aquifer to an above-zone monitoring interval and to assess the monitorability of CO2 leakage on the basis of temperature data. The impact of both CO2 and brine leakage on temperature response is considered for three cases (1) a leaky well co-located with the injection well, (2) a leaky well distant from the injector, and (3) a leaky fault. A sensitivity analysis was performed to determine key operational and reservoir parameters that control the temperature signal in the above zone. Throughout the analysis injection-zone parameters remain unchanged. Significant pressure drop upon leakage causes expansion of CO2 associated with Joule–Thomson cooling. However, brine may begin leaking before CO2 breakthrough at the leakage pathway, causing heating in the above zone. Thus, unlike the pressure which increases in response to both CO2 and brine leakage, the temperature signal may differentiate between the leaking fluids. In addition, the strength of the temperature signal correlates with leakage velocity unlike pressure signal whose strength depends on leakage rate. Increasing leakage conduit cross-sectional area increases leakage rate and thus increases pressure change in the above zone. However, it decreases leakage velocity, and therefore, reduces temperature cooling and signal. It is also shown that the leakage-induced temperature change covers a small area around the leakage pathway. Thus, temperature data will be most useful if collected along potential leaky wells and/or wells intersecting potential leaky faults.

Collection GCCC Bookshelf
Pages 15
Volume
Issue Number
Keywords Monitoring-downhole pressure Modeling-Flow simulation Monitoring
Year 2014
Date Published 0000-00-00 00:00:00
Label
Accession Number
Download (.pdf format)
Download
Item Type Link

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.