Vadose Techniques |
|
|
|
|
The
Bureau has used a variety of instruments to monitor soil physics
parameters, including water content, water pressure, and hydraulic
conductivity. The Bureau has two neutron probes (Model 503DR Hydroprobe,
CPN, Martinez, CA) and various types of time domain reflectometry
systems to monitor soil water content. The neutron probe is used
to monitor the vertical variation in water content in neutron probe
access tubes. The probe is calibrated using water content data from
soil samples based on oven-dried measurements of core samples. A
41 m deep access tube was installed to monitor water content in
the Hueco Bolson in West Texas. Temporal variability in water content
is used to monitor infiltration. Horizontal access tubes (aluminum
and clay) were used to monitor water movement beneath a prototype
engineered cover designed for waste containment at a site in West
Texas. The SEAMIST system (FLUTe, Santa Fe, NM) is used to transport
the neutron probe through the horizontal neutron probe access tubes.
|
Time
domain reflectometry was used to monitor water content at many sites
in Texas. Two different systems were used, a Tektronix system (Tektronix
Inc. Model 1502c, Beaver, OR) and a TRASE system (Soilmoisture Equipment
Corp, Santa Barbara, CA). Different types of probes were also used:
30 cm long uncoated probes (Campbell Scientific Inc. model 610),
20 cm uncoated probes (Soilmoisture Equipment Corp. model 6005),
and 20 cm long coated probes (Soilmoisture Equipment Corp. model
6005C). The coated probes were used to reduce signal attenuation
in high conductivity materials. TDR also measures bulk soil electrical
conductivity, which may be useful for monitoring infiltration. TDR
probes were installed in pits dug to a maximum depth of 1.8 m. The
probes were inserted into the walls of the pit to minimize disturbance
of soils above the probes. Water content varies with soil texture;
therefore, spatial variations in water content cannot be used to
determine the direction of water movement. |
|
The direction of water movement can be determined from the gradient
in potential energy because water moves from regions of high energy
to low energy. Potential energy is the energy that results from
position in a force field including gravity, capillarity (under
wet conditions), adsorption (under dry conditions), and osmotic
force fields in the unsaturated zone. Matric potential describes
the forces related to the soil matrix and includes capillary and
adsorptive forces. Osmotic potential results from the addition
of solutes to the pore water. Water potential includes matric
and osmotic potential. The Bureau has used a wide variety of instruments
to measure or monitor these pressure potentials in the unsaturated
zone. Water potential can be measured in the laboratory on soil
cores collected in the field using a thermocouple psychrometer
sample changer (Decagon SC10A model) or a water activity meter
(Decagon CX2 model). These instruments measure the relative humidity
of the air around the soil, which is related to the water potential
using the Kelvin equation. The Bureau has installed tensiometers
and advanced tensiometers to monitor potentials in the wet range
in the field. The Bureau has also installed thermocouple psychrometers
and heat dissipation sensors to monitor potentials in the dry
range (Figure 1). Heat dissipation
sensors measure the rate at which a heat pulse is dissipated in
the instrument matrix material, which increases with increasing
saturation and is related to pressure through laboratory calibration.
Monitoring data provide information on infiltration and deep drainage
in the vadose zone. Field installations include data loggers (CR7x,
CR10x, CR21x, or CR23X) and are transmitted to the office using
cellular data telemetry. Figure 2
shows the results of long term monitoring of water potentials
at a sandy site in the Hueco Bolson in west Texas. The data show
infiltration of water to 0.8 m depth. The lack of infiltration
to greater depths reflects the ability of vegetation to remove
water through evapotranspiration and minimize subsurface flow.
Typical upward water potential gradients result from long-term
drying of unsaturated sediments for the past 10,000 yr and indicate
that there is no recharge in these interdrainage settings in arid
regions.
|
References:
(Reprints available upon request.) |
Scanlon,
B. R., and Andraski, B. J., 2002, Miscellaneous methods for
measuring matric or water potential: Pages 643-670 in J. H.
Dane and G. C. Topp, editors. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part
4 Physical Methods. Soil Science Society of America, Inc.,
Madison, Wisconsin. [PDF] |
Andraski,
B. J., and Scanlon, B. R., 2002, Thermocouple psychrometry:
Pages 609-642 in J. H. Dane and G. C. Topp, editors. Methods
of Soil Analysis, Part 4, Physical Methods. Soil Science Society
of America, Inc., Madison, Wisconsin. [PDF] |
|
Permeability
in Unsaturated Media |
The
Bureau has estimated permeability in unsaturated media by monitoring
atmospheric pumping as a result of barometric pressure fluctuations
and performed pneumatic pressure tests as part of a research program
conducted at the Maricopa Environmental Monitoring site to evaluate
unsaturated zone monitoring techniques and strategies. This study
was funded by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. |
References: |
Young,
M. H., Wierenga, P. J., Warrick, A. W., Hoffmann, L. L., Musil,
S. A., Scanlon, B. R., and Nicholson, R. J., 1996, Field testing
plan for unsaturated zone monitoring and field studies: NUREG/CR-6462,
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. |
Young,
M. H., Wierenga, P. J., Warrick, A. W., Hoffmann, L. L., Musil,
S. A., Yao, M., Mai, C. J., Zou, Z., and Scanlon, B. R., 1999,
Results of field studies at the Maricopa Environmental Monitoring
Site, Arizona. NUREG/CR5694, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
260 p. |
|
|
Saturated
Hydraulic Conductivity |
The
Bureau routinely measures saturated hydraulic conductivity in the
laboratory using constant head or falling head approaches. The Bureau
has a flexible wall permeameter to measure hydraulic conductivity
in sediments of low conductivity in the laboratory |
Guelph
Permeameter |
The
Bureau has used a Guelph permeameter (model 2800K, Soilmoisture
Equipment Corp, Santa Barbara, CA) and borehole permeameter to measure
saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks) in unsaturated sediments.
The Guelph permeameter is generally used to measure Ks in the shallow
subsurface. Constant head borehole permeameter tests were used to
estimate Ks at much greater depths in the unsaturated zone. We have
also evaluated techniques for analyzing the borehole permeameter
tests. |
References:
Xiang, J., Scanlon, B. R., Mullican, W. F. I., Chen, L., and Goldsmith,
R. S., 1997, A multistep constant-head borehole test to determine
field saturated hydraulic conductivity of layered soils: Advances
in Water Resources, v. 20, pp. 45-57. [PDF] |
| Water
Retention Functions |
The
Bureau also develops water retention functions for different soils,
which describes the relationship between water content and water
potential. Hanging water columns are used to measure water retention
in the wet range (0-0.25 bar) and pressure plate extractors are
used in the dry range (1, 5, and 15 bar chambers). |
March 2006 |
|