Comments
on Geologic Parameters
16
Rock Mineralogy:
Published
lithologic descriptions of the lower Cedar Keys and Lawson Dolomites
vary (Applin and Applin, 1944, 1967; Vernon, 1951; Chen, 1965),
indicating that (1) the boundaries of these units remain poorly
defined and/or (2) these units vary laterally. Difference in lithology
is primarily degree of dolomitization, crystal size, and relative
proportion of anhydrite. Winston (1977) gave perhaps the best summary
of lower Cedar Keys and upper Lawson Dolomite composition. He stated
that the lower Cedar Keys was tan, microolitic or micropeletal dolomite
of varying thickness and cemented by clear calcium sulfate, whose
mineralogy has not been determined. He described the upper Lawson
Dolomite as very fine to fine crystalline anhedral or euhedral dolomite
with occasional streaks of very fine to fine-grained skeletal dolomite.
Applin and Applin (1944) and Vernon (1951) reported gypsum in the
upper Lawson Dolomite.
16
Map:
16
Table:
16
Reference:
Applin,
P. L., and Applin, E. R., 1944, Regional subsurface stratigraphy
and structure of Florida and southern Georgia: American Association
of Petroleum Geologists, v. 28, p. 16731753.
___________
1967, The Gulf Series in the subsurface in northern Florida and
southern Georgia: U.S. Geological Survey, Professional Paper 524-G,
35 p., 8 plates.
Chen,
S. C., 1965, The regional stratigraphic analysis of Paleocene and
Eocene rocks of Florida: Florida Geological Survey Bulletin No.
45, 105 p.
Vernon,
R. O., 1951, The geology of Citrus and Levy counties, Florida: Florida
Geological Survey Bulletin 33, 256 p.
Winston,
G. O., 1977, Cotype wells for the five classic formations in peninsular
Florida: Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies Transactions,
v. 27, p. 421427.